Adult Vacation
Adult Vacation

Thread: Escort Classified Ads - Member Discussions

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 179 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 2674
This forum thread is moderated by Admin
  1. #2674
    Regular Member


    Posts: 25

    PReach brother Glock!!

    Let the congregation say AMEN!! GM has got the business model down to a sience. I will just add yes this helps witht he prodivers, but also the members / mongers can be just as big a help to the girls as well and then I think it will really blow up.

    Just my thoughts of course.

    Quote Originally Posted by Glockman  [View Original Post]
    A2, I have a suggestion. Instead of trying to fix the broken USASG Adult Classified Ads (a dubious task), why not admit that it has been a disappointment and bring back the old system with a couple of tweaks. Let's face it, the current Classified Ads can never compete with BP, despite the claim that the USASG Classified Ads are touted to "Soon to be the Internet's largest adult classified website. " That's wishful thinking at best. Instead bring back the old system of "Escort Classified Ads-Posted by Escorts. " Frankly, I miss the old system. It was on the same forum as all other threads. When a provider did a post, you could immediately find it, read it and know it was current. When a lady posted a photograph, it showed up in the gallery in full size and not the postage size in the USASG Classified Ads. Under the new system, you have to go to another site, you never know how current an ad is, the layout is lame and there is no means for interaction with the providers. Hell, many of the advertisers never post on our thread. They may not care or even know how to. Under the old system, they at least were part of the USASG community. If you are planning to charge for the "new version," I am going to predict that that will be the death of it. Instead, I suggest you being the old Escort Classified Ad-Posted by Escorts thread back with three changes. First charge the Escort-Advertisers for the privilege of posting on it. Charge whatever you were going to charge with the new version. At least, you could make some money, but remember many providers can barely make ends meet now. Second, allow the mongers to posts on the thread. That lets the mongers and the providers interact with each other. A welcome change from the present. Third, let the lady defend herself. Why not. If some guy says "I wouldn't fuck you with some other guy's dick," she could reply "good, because your dick smells like three day old piss!" At least we would get everyone's side of the story. If a girl stands a guy up or goes dark, she will have to explain why. It seems that it would be cheaper because you would not be supporting two web sites, but only one. Am I alone. I miss the old section where I could check out a provider's posts and she could check out mine. This is a great site, much better than ECCIE or the late TER. It's a community. That's what makes it so great. This would let you keep it that way.

  2. #2673
    No state line in gastonia ner lake wily.

    Quote Originally Posted by Iceman61  [View Original Post]
    You're posting in the wrong forum since you live on the other end of the state near Charlotte. Most of your posts state that you need a $40 to drive to you since you don't have a car. Good luck with that one no matter where you live.

  3. #2672

    Only Rose

    Quote Originally Posted by TidePride  [View Original Post]
    Did you ever get any feedback on any of these girls? Love me some beautiful ebony girls but I'm not doing much TOFTT these days. Did enough of that in the past.
    Someone, I can't remember who, who was asking me via PM about Venom, said something like "she's not worth seeing" nothing more than that, so I didn't check her out.

    Perhaps, whoever it was could fill us in with more details.

  4. #2671
    I saw her several months ago. She has a gorgeous face with smiling that strikes me when I met her first. She talked softly with great intelligence. And I had a great view from her rear. I had a great time with her.

    She is about 5'4" and 130 or 140.

    Quote Originally Posted by SevenInch  [View Original Post]
    http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/memp...-3063/1/543951

    This one has me curious. Has anybody seen her? 7.

  5. #2670
    Quote Originally Posted by SevenInch  [View Original Post]
    http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/memp...-3063/1/543951

    This one has me curious. Has anybody seen her? 7.
    Haven't; but now she's on my radar. Update me if you do, and I'll do the same. Might have to TOFTT.

  6. #2669

    Nadia

    http://liveescortreviews.com/ad/memp...-3063/1/543951

    This one has me curious. Has anybody seen her? 7.

  7. #2668

    Any Feedback?

    Did you ever get any feedback on any of these girls? Love me some beautiful ebony girls but I'm not doing much TOFTT these days. Did enough of that in the past.

  8. #2667

    New provider ad features

    Quote Originally Posted by Glockman  [View Original Post]
    A2, I have a suggestion. Instead of trying to fix the broken USASG Adult Classified Ads (a dubious task), why not admit that it has been a disappointment and bring back the old system with a couple of tweaks. Let's face it, the current Classified Ads can never compete with BP, despite the claim that the USASG Classified Ads are touted to "Soon to be the Internet's largest adult classified website. " That's wishful thinking at best. Instead bring back the old system of "Escort Classified Ads-Posted by Escorts. " Frankly, I miss the old system. It was on the same forum as all other threads. When a provider did a post, you could immediately find it, read it and know it was current. When a lady posted a photograph, it showed up in the gallery in full size and not the postage size in the USASG Classified Ads. Under the new system, you have to go to another site, you never know how current an ad is, the layout is lame and there is no means for interaction with the providers. Hell, many of the advertisers never post on our thread. They may not care or even know how to. Under the old system, they at least were part of the USASG community. If you are planning to charge for the "new version," I am going to predict that that will be the death of it. Instead, I suggest you being the old Escort Classified Ad-Posted by Escorts thread back with three changes. First charge the Escort-Advertisers for the privilege of posting on it. Charge whatever you were going to charge with the new version. At least, you could make some money, but remember many providers can barely make ends meet now. Second, allow the mongers to posts on the thread. That lets the mongers and the providers interact with each other. A welcome change from the present. Third, let the lady defend herself. Why not. If some guy says "I wouldn't fuck you with some other guy's dick," she could reply "good, because your dick smells like three day old piss!" At least we would get everyone's side of the story. If a girl stands a guy up or goes dark, she will have to explain why. It seems that it would be cheaper because you would not be supporting two web sites, but only one. Am I alone. I miss the old section where I could check out a provider's posts and she could check out mine. This is a great site, much better than ECCIE or the late TER. It's a community. That's what makes it so great. This would let you keep it that way.
    I agree with you glock, the old provider section was SO much better. Could he add a member request section to let guys post their own "want ads" and only let providers respond to them?? Gives us a idea who is available, who isn't, who is in town visiting and so forth. Other hobby locations would benefit from it too.

  9. #2666
    Quote Originally Posted by Glockman  [View Original Post]
    A2, I have a suggestion. Instead of trying to fix the broken USASG Adult Classified Ads (a dubious task), why not admit that it has been a disappointment and bring back the old system with a couple of tweaks. Let's face it, the current Classified Ads can never compete with BP, despite the claim that the USASG Classified Ads are touted to "Soon to be the Internet's largest adult classified website. " That's wishful thinking at best. Instead bring back the old system of "Escort Classified Ads-Posted by Escorts. " Frankly, I miss the old system. It was on the same forum as all other threads. When a provider did a post, you could immediately find it, read it and know it was current. When a lady posted a photograph, it showed up in the gallery in full size and not the postage size in the USASG Classified Ads. Under the new system, you have to go to another site, you never know how current an ad is, the layout is lame and there is no means for interaction with the providers. Hell, many of the advertisers never post on our thread. They may not care or even know how to. Under the old system, they at least were part of the USASG community. If you are planning to charge for the "new version," I am going to predict that that will be the death of it. Instead, I suggest you being the old Escort Classified Ad-Posted by Escorts thread back with three changes. First charge the Escort-Advertisers for the privilege of posting on it. Charge whatever you were going to charge with the new version. At least, you could make some money, but remember many providers can barely make ends meet now. Second, allow the mongers to posts on the thread. That lets the mongers and the providers interact with each other. A welcome change from the present. Third, let the lady defend herself. Why not. If some guy says "I wouldn't fuck you with some other guy's dick," she could reply "good, because your dick smells like three day old piss!" At least we would get everyone's side of the story. If a girl stands a guy up or goes dark, she will have to explain why. It seems that it would be cheaper because you would not be supporting two web sites, but only one. Am I alone. I miss the old section where I could check out a provider's posts and she could check out mine. This is a great site, much better than ECCIE or the late TER. It's a community. That's what makes it so great. This would let you keep it that way.
    I agree, Glockman. If we had the intereaction between the guys and the girls, just think how popular this site could be.

  10. #2665

    Bring Back the Old, Don't Bother With the New Version

    Quote Originally Posted by JohnGrow  [View Original Post]
    I've wondered the same. I doubt that it will change.

    It's going to change with the new version.

    A2
    A2, I have a suggestion. Instead of trying to fix the broken USASG Adult Classified Ads (a dubious task), why not admit that it has been a disappointment and bring back the old system with a couple of tweaks. Let's face it, the current Classified Ads can never compete with BP, despite the claim that the USASG Classified Ads are touted to "Soon to be the Internet's largest adult classified website. " That's wishful thinking at best. Instead bring back the old system of "Escort Classified Ads-Posted by Escorts. " Frankly, I miss the old system. It was on the same forum as all other threads. When a provider did a post, you could immediately find it, read it and know it was current. When a lady posted a photograph, it showed up in the gallery in full size and not the postage size in the USASG Classified Ads. Under the new system, you have to go to another site, you never know how current an ad is, the layout is lame and there is no means for interaction with the providers. Hell, many of the advertisers never post on our thread. They may not care or even know how to. Under the old system, they at least were part of the USASG community. If you are planning to charge for the "new version," I am going to predict that that will be the death of it. Instead, I suggest you being the old Escort Classified Ad-Posted by Escorts thread back with three changes. First charge the Escort-Advertisers for the privilege of posting on it. Charge whatever you were going to charge with the new version. At least, you could make some money, but remember many providers can barely make ends meet now. Second, allow the mongers to posts on the thread. That lets the mongers and the providers interact with each other. A welcome change from the present. Third, let the lady defend herself. Why not. If some guy says "I wouldn't fuck you with some other guy's dick," she could reply "good, because your dick smells like three day old piss!" At least we would get everyone's side of the story. If a girl stands a guy up or goes dark, she will have to explain why. It seems that it would be cheaper because you would not be supporting two web sites, but only one. Am I alone. I miss the old section where I could check out a provider's posts and she could check out mine. This is a great site, much better than ECCIE or the late TER. It's a community. That's what makes it so great. This would let you keep it that way.

  11. #2664
    Quote Originally Posted by EvilerDuckmann  [View Original Post]
    I first contacted her last year when she was new, I asked the usual questions and had to explain what they meant, BBBJ was. 5 extra and no daty or greek. So of course I was polite and said no ty, next day I got a text from her number asking.

    "what's wrong with my girl, she will fuck you good".

    Me "no daty, no date".

    "I don't allow no one to do that but me".

    Me "Have a great day".

    "Fuck you, piece of s#$ at ".

    I kept that conversation for 6 months to remind me not to text her.

    So yes Memdal, her Bf / pimp expects you to come in, pound, pay and leave. Clueless.
    Interesting. She let me do it, but that was about a year ago. She wouldn't do BBBJ though.

  12. #2663
    Quote Originally Posted by Memdal  [View Original Post]
    It really bothers me some of these girls that think an appointment means slap on the cover and pound in whatever position you want, but that 's it. Especially when she is advertising like Ryder does. A few of her comments in her ads are "full services, non-rushed" "amazing skills" "licensed role-play model" None of those lines should be associated with a non-GFE girl.
    That's exactly what Ryder was when I saw her last year, cover up and pound away. No BJ at all and please dispose the cover so my bf / pimp doesn't see it because he does want to see it. I attribute this to her age. Coincidentally, her bf / pimp is as young as she is.

  13. #2662
    Quote Originally Posted by Memdal  [View Original Post]
    Why is it that the USA Classifieds section ads never seem to change? I can log on three or four days in a row and find the exact same ads in the exact same order, just showing as that day rather than the day before. Makes it impossible to tell, or suspicious to picture, which ads are really posted and which ones are not. At least with backpage or eccie or some other sites, the ads seem to be in an order based on when placed. And, with USA, have you noticed that every ad that you click on and bring up for that day shows the exact same time the time you are looking at it, not when it posted (for example: Monday, 20 March, 2017 19:56.

    Hits: 174). Just observing. Would be much more helpful if it had some chronological relevance to the ads.
    Or if they had to repost daily with no auto renew. I hate auto renew cause you never know who is really looking that day.

  14. #2661

    Good question Memdal!

    I've wondered the same. I doubt that it will change.

    It's going to change with the new version.

    A2

  15. #2660

    How do you tell which USA Ads are real for that day?

    Why is it that the USA Classifieds section ads never seem to change? I can log on three or four days in a row and find the exact same ads in the exact same order, just showing as that day rather than the day before. Makes it impossible to tell, or suspicious to picture, which ads are really posted and which ones are not. At least with backpage or eccie or some other sites, the ads seem to be in an order based on when placed. And, with USA, have you noticed that every ad that you click on and bring up for that day shows the exact same time the time you are looking at it, not when it posted (for example: Monday, 20 March, 2017 19:56.

    Hits: 174). Just observing. Would be much more helpful if it had some chronological relevance to the ads.

+ Add Report
Page 1 of 179 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 51 101 ... LastLast

Posting Limitations

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Worldwide escort directory

City Girls

Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape